Etiquetas

1976 1985 1995 1996 1997 2002 2016 Afganistán Albert Sánchez Piñol Aldous Huxley Alemania Alessandro Baricco Alexandría Andes Angola Antoine Saint-Exupéry António Lobo Antunes Argentina Atwood Auster Autoficción Barcelona Barnes Beatnik Berlin Biafra Bioy Casares Borges Boston Bruce Chatwin Buechner Buenos Aires Bukowski Camilo Jose Cela Cannery row Carlos Castaneda Castaneda Catalunya Chile Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie Ciencia Ficción Coetzee Congo César Aira D.H. Lawrence Dave Eggers Dostojewskij Douglas Adams Egipto Enrique Vila-Matas España Estonia Fernando Pessoa Fogwill Francia Gabriel García Márquez George Orwell Glavinic Goethe Gonçalo M. Tavares Graham Greene Greene Guerra Civil Espaniola Handke Harry Hole Haruki Murakami Helena Corbellini Henry Trujillo Herman Koch Hermann Hesse Herrndorf Houellebecq Irak Irán Isla Islam Italia Jack Kerouac Jo Nesbo John Irving Juan José Millás Juan Pablo Villarino Juan Rulfo Julian Barnes Kehlmann Lawrence Durell Levrero London Luxemburgo Mairal Malvinas Manuel da Silva Ramos Marc-Uwe Kling Margaret Atwood Mario Levrero Mario Vargas Llosa Mazzantini Montevideo Munich Murakami Nicaragua Niccolò Ammaniti Nigeria Nueva York Octavio Paz Olguín Oriente Osvaldo Baigorria Pablo Ramos Paris Patagonia Pedro Paramo. latinoamericano Perú Politica ficcion Premio Nobel Puig Rafik Schami Reino Unido República Dominicana Robert Musil Rusia Sacheri Saer Schnitzler Sergio Olguín Siria Skármeta Sudafrica Suecia Tango Tomás Eloy Martínez Trujillo Viena abuela aburrido academicos africa alegoría alienación amazonas america amistad amor anarquismo arge arte austríaco autor autoritarismo autostop aventura benedetti biologia brasil caballos campo canada canguru capitalismo catalan chatwin chinos ciencia ficcion ciudad civilizacion clases sociales clasico clásico cocina colombia colonialismo colores comunismo consciencia contemporáneo crisis economica critica social crotos cuentos cuentos cortos cuidad culpa y inocencia cultura daniel Kehlmann darwinismo depresión derecho desaparecidos desarollo desgracia detectives dialogo diario dictadura dinero distopia distopia/utopia drogas escritura espacio urbano espionaje estados unidos estadounidense estilo de escritura moderna evolucion exilio existencialismo familia fantasia fantástico fauna felicidad feminismo ficción futbol futuro gales gemelos geografia guerilla guerra guerra civil guerrilla hippie hippies historia holandés homosexualidad humor identidad idioma ilustrado imigracion india indigenas infancia infantil inglaterra ingles inmigrantes intercultural intriga italiano john steinbeck joseph conrad jovenes juvenil kafka kafkiano latino latinoamericano lenguaje libros lisboa literatura africana literatura alemana literatura pop lunfardo mar memoria meta-ficcion mexico minirelatos mitologia mitología moderno moral moçambique mujer mujeres multiculturalismo navegar no vale la pena nomada nomadismo non-fiction novela novela corta novela de barrio novela negra nueva novela latinoamericana nómada nómadas obrero occidente okupas onetti oso ostracismo otro libro aleman parabola partido comunista pastiche percepción periodismo persia peru playa poesia poesía policial policíaca poligamia porcelana portugal portugues prostitucion psicoananalisis puerto racismo raza realismo realismo magico realismo. cela relato religion rio ritual de pasaje rui zink sabiduria satira serie: O reino sexo sexualidad siglo XX sigloXIX simulacro sistema escolar soledad sueño surrealismo tremendismo trilogía involuntaria triologia truco turismo unicornios uruguay utopia politica vagabundo vagabundos vargas llosa vejez viaje viajero vida y muerte. vide de campo vigilancia violencia violencia domestica violencia sexual zadie smith
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta young adult. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta young adult. Mostrar todas las entradas

18 noviembre, 2025

Donna Tartt - The secret history (1992)

  

The secret history is a novel about friendship, youth, about wanting to belong. And about fatal flaws. The structure of the book is very unusual and refreshing as it tells the outcomes in its very first pages, namely the murder that occurs. From the very beginning we know who has done it. But we don’t know how things got there and what happened afterwards.

It’s not a book in which the ending or outcome really matters, but the heart of the book.

It is not really a thriller or mystery or detective novel, but basically a psychological study of a couple young students and their group dynamic, blinded by their love for each other, and for ancient Greek culture. I find those themes fascinating. An emotional roller-coaster, a book to get lost in with its 628 pages.

The novel is set in a liberal arts college in the northeast of the United States, in Vermont, so northern it is almost in Canada. I know not everyone had the same college experience, but for many of us it was this kind of place where we tried to form our adult identities and to connect to others in a way to help building these identities, because we admired those friends, and found them beautiful and knowledgeable, especially if we are a bit insecure. We thought our our college friends will be in our lives forever. We also do a lot of sh*t at college because we think we’re adults but instead we are still so young and influencable.

I do enjoy campus novels, in general. I think its the first time I read something of the “dark academia” genre, except maybe Harry potter. I didn’t know about this genre before first googling this book, it’s basically a trend whereby people wear black coats, write with fountain pens and admire gothic architecture and cold weather. The secret history is as gripping a novel as Harry Potter (I myself was the same age as Harry when the books came out, 12, which is a big reason of why and how I became a reader).


As I said The prologue of The secret history already tells the reader about death of Bunny, a murder, Henry’s idea. In the main part, Richard our narrator is looking back and retelling the story from a later point in time, and then he notices a lot was actually ominous, a lot of details, pointing in the bad way things went, he had initially overlooked. That’s the reason I don't think I can really do spoilers, because it’s all there being said in the beginning, when you read it you get on the emotional journey with the characters even knowing the basic facts of the plot.

The narrator Richard Papen grew up middle class-poor on the west coast, Northern California but not the picturesque California, more like eternal suburbia, where there are no trees, everything flat and dust colored. He arrives at Hampden College a bit by chance – or fate, as he puts it of course, and tries to fit in with the rich kids. He tells us his worst flaw is a morbid longing for the picturesque – for whatever that means, it’s on the reader to figure that out. In any case his choice to study Ancient Greek, a kind of random decision proofs to be fateful.

He stumbles upon the group of friends in the library, they study Greek, the one thing they have in common. Everyone of them is a bizarre character.

In the first weeks at the college, Richard gets a student job and goes talk to Greek professor to let him in his class. Julian Morrow, the Greek prof, seems weird and eccentric. There are rumors about him, he keeps big arrangements flowers in his office. Richard insists, even after the prof saying his course is complete, five students are the limit, one more what be too many (foreshadowing). He convinces him to be taken in, but Student services warn him, it is an exception to the normal functioning of the college to be taught almost exclusively by his Greek teacher, and not necessarily good, if problems occur, he can’t go back and change, but in the end they let him.

So he makes friends with the Greek class group and gets to know them. Charles and Camilla are twins, very close to each other, 20 years old, orphans from Virginia, very much not poor. Francis is a thin and nervous boy, he has a very young mother with a rich Daddy, he has exotic looks, is a red head and wears false glasses. Bunny, full name Edmund, 24 years old, is blond, badly dressed, loud, outgoing. Bunny had the typical American childhood with 4 brothers living in Cape Cod, going sailing, etc. And finally Henry, serious, tall, with classes, cold and smart, he seems to be very close to the Greek teacher, and he has a car.

Bunny takes Richard out for dinner for 300 dollars and then says he forgot his wallet. Eventually Henry comes to the rescue. Francis’ family has a big old house in the country belonging to some aunt of this, which they use to spend the weekends.

In the first Greek class they talk about the necessity to channel dyonistic forces (more foreshadowing here). I would have loved to have more insight into the Greek classes, but the author doesn’t dive further into that. I will contain myself here to not spoil more of the narrative, here.

In Vermont it is winter through many month, very different from California, it snows and gets freezing cold. On Christmas break school shuts down because heating is expensive, everyone is with their relatives back home, but Richard having no money for a flight back home, nor the will to go there, spends winter in a rented room warehouse with whole in the roof and almost dies of pneumonia.

Some of the hints are phrases that stick into one’s mind, like honesty being a dangerous virtue, or beauty being related to terror. Right in the beginning Richard says that he has a morbid longing for the picturesque, which I think is not the same as beauty.

Then – !- they kill him, and we’re just about halfway of the novel - what a setup.

In the aftermath, contrary to the expected, they all get real nervous, every class Bunny is missing and they sit around waiting for him, the tension builds up, some try to distract themselves with normal college life, alcohol, sex with no luck. Now the four of them are bonded for life for the good or the bad of it.

I devoured the The secret history, I loved it, it blew my mind, absorbed me and still, when I handed it to my friends they didn’t even seem to be able to get into it, to connect and found all characters annoying and little relatable. It’s a not perfect novel, and those are rare, but still a very very good one, one of those I can imagine to re read in a couple of years despite getting a bit long in the second half.

I really enjoyed The secret history. I think it has some minor problems, for example, you could say it is not very realistic, or the characters are not really people you could want to deal with, but for me these were minor hiccups, I did connect with Richard, the narrator, and I think the novel is a masterpiece. The secret history was Donna Tartt’s debut novel. She was only 28 years old by the time she published it, which is very impressive. I already bought her other big novel “The Goldfinch” and I can’t wait to read it.


06 octubre, 2025

Dolly Alderton - Ghosts (2020)

to ghost someone = “the act or practice of abruptly cutting off all contact with someone (such as a former romantic partner) usually without explanation by no longer accepting or responding to phone calls, instant messages, etc.”1


In this case the Ghosts of the title is also referring to a father losing memories due to dementia, and the protagonist losing her old friendships to their marriages and babies.


My friend referred to it as my sex-and-the-city-novel, and I couldn’t describe it better, it’s all about navigating early adult life, believing or not in marriage and love, about ex boyfriends and dating, about being in your early 30s going out and drink and buying your first house and the anxiety of building a future for you and not getting any younger again. Understandably at this stage of life we sometimes feel still like a child and hesitate with certain decisions or struggle with responsibilities. Notably it’s mostly the men in the novel that are selfish, childish, a bit careless and not even honest about it with themselves.


It is clearly a book written for young women. The main character Nina George Dean just bought her first own flat in London Archway, and is back to dating after her long term relationship broke up. As a first person narrator she is retelling the events that happened in her life between her 32nd to her 33rd birthday, the “strangest year of her life”, which to me personally didn’t feel very strange or extraordinary at all. Her name is associated with George Micheal, who’s song was top of the charts when she was born.


Nina works a kitchen book writer publishing her own books, sufficiently successful as to be able to live from it. She published a book called “Taste”, a second one “The tiny kitchen”, and is now starting her third one, weirdly she chats with her editor about her personal life, I don’t know if this is common. She used to be a English teacher like her father, in fact she is very close to her Dad, who has dementia and is deteriorating which is a very difficult condition to witness and accompany.


Nina’s ex boyfriend Joe now has a new girlfriend, she and Joe were together for 7 years, now she has been single for 2. So, Nina decides it’s time to download a dating app and starts dating again. She starts going out with Max, 37, tall, masculine, surfer type, accountant, a bit insecure or at least introvert. They fall in love, but after 3 months of relationship Max disappears all of a sudden.


A lot of the novel is just reciting stereotypes. Nina and her friends talk about how friends and their wives behave, men want to impress, girls want to make friends. Lola is her only single friend, a yoga girl with eccentric taste clothing, always drinking prosecco or wine, talking probably about astrology (I don’t remember) a dating expert. A fun character, the Samantha of Sex and the City.

Katherine is her oldest friend, now married with children and moving to the suburbs with little time or comprehension for her childless friends. Nina also has to handle a strange new neighbour in her building who doesn’t respect anything of basic conviviality rules.


She has always had a difficult relationship with her mother who seems a hateful selfish person, with not much of personality anyway. This is put on a further strain with her Dad’s health issues.


So this is it, not much else happens. Nina is looking for meaning in life, in the decisions made y the people around her, but instead she finds mostly only pragmatism or convenience which disappoints her, but doesn’t make her lose her optimism.

I don’t regret reading Ghosts, but the characters are a bit flat, the plot a bit short, and it straight out bored me. It’s not really bad, but definitely not good either. I found it hard to identify myself in any of the characters, even as a woman in my (late) 30s. I can't relate to this life personally, I have very few couples among my friends who actually got married and going to the pubs and drink is a thing that I left in my 20s. I also know very few people who still celebrate their birthdays is their 30s with cake and invitations and their parents and all. Nina listens to female serial killer podcasts, the kind of “true crime” (the worst category of podcast, in my opinion this makes her even more pathetic). The narrator starts the novel announcing “The strangest year of her life” which makes you want to read it, but in the end to me it looked like a pretty event-less year except for the father’s health deteriorating.


Looking at the cover it becomes clear to me that I normally wouldn’t have chosen to buy this book, but I had read a nice recommendation somewhere and made an effort to not judge it by its cover.


Not really funny, not deep, not really emotional, but very readable, however a bit boring and predictable. The kind of book you can read with half of your brain switched off, just to wind down before sleeping.


1https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ghosting



Archivo del Blog

Translate